FUD is generally a strategic attempt to influence perception by disseminating negative and dubious or false information. An individual firm, for example, might use FUD to invite unfavorable opinions and speculation about a competitor’s product; to increase the general estimation of switching costs among current customers; or to maintain leverage over a current business partner who could potentially become a rival.
My experience is that FUD has limitations. More after the election.
Again I ask: why did Cathy Jacob say in her email that it was NOT Scott Sclegel’s fault? And where did Rowan & Steib fit into the picture years ago when Villio/Buisson tried to use it against them? And why did Landry/Buisson edit out the exculpatory wording?
It is not unreasonable to think that at the time of the email, she was not yet aware of who was to blame. Have no idea about the other questions.
When is the robo-call from the Grand Isle molestation victim’s mother coming? They must be saving that one for election day.
Mrs. Landry’s been a bad girl, and bad girls get REPRIMANDED!
themisola – when you posted your duplicitous b/s at 2:30 this afternoon the truth of landry’s ethical violation was already earlier reported here in SLABBED. in quibbling the landry lie you defend a demonstably unacceptable liar: unacceptable as a judge, unacceptable to any but the “friends & family” that is the J/P political mob.
Be known by the company you keep: pieces of crap “stick together”.
Hey kidd – you and your cacophonous and hypocritical ilk couldn’t hold an ethical candle to Landry. I will gladly be known by that company, particularly over that of you shrill yentas. My “duplicitous b/s” as you call it is in fact the truth. I believe it was unslabbed in an earlier post who said it best regarding how this campaign got crossways, but I would urge each of you, particularly that runt prince to go find Hilary, or Mickey, or Connick, or Newell, and tell them face to face what you think of them. I know for a fact that a few of you are the living breathing embodiments of duplicitous.
You want me to do what, now?