damned if you do, damned if you don’t – are you pro the con of federal regulation?

“This is a halfway house,” Lord Levene said of a proposal devised by U.S. Treasury officials earlier this year that would create a federal office for insurance regulation.

Wrong house, Lord Levene, try Animal House.

Ladies and gentlemen, I’ll be brief. The issue here is not whether we broke a few rules, or took a few liberties with our female party guests – we did.

But you can’t hold a whole fraternity responsible for the behavior of a few, sick twisted individuals. For if you do, then shouldn’t we blame the whole fraternity system? And if the whole fraternity system is guilty, then isn’t this an indictment of our educational institutions in general?

I put it to you, Greg – isn’t this an indictment of our entire American society? Well, you can do whatever you want to us, but we’re not going to sit here and listen to you badmouth the United States of America. Gentlemen!

How do we begin to regulate an industry that made Katrina a toga party?

I think we have to go all out. I think that this situation absolutely requires a really futile and stupid gesture be done on somebody’s part.

The only question is who’s going to step up with the really futile and stupid gesture? Reuters has the  the story.

The United States is expected to embrace federal regulation of the insurance industry as early as 2009, to financial and insurance executives, pushed to the forefront by the global economic crisis.

Federal regulation in the United States—something that most other nations already have—is expected, at least initially, to function in tandem with the existing state regulatory framework rather then supplant it, Lloyd’s of London’s chairman Peter Levene told Reuters on Tuesday.

“It is gaining quite a bit of traction, and if it happens in the next year, we would regard that as good progress,” Lord Levene added.

The near failure of insurance giant American International Group Inc. has propelled the likelihood of federal regulation of the industry. Insurers are now regulated by states.

The United States had to step in to save AIG in September after state regulators ran out of resources to help the company address a severe cash crunch.

AIG’s bailout—pulled together by the U.S. Treasury, Federal Reserve and New York State insurance regulator over a matter of days as the insurer neared bankruptcy—has swelled to $150 billion from an initial $85 billion.

Lack of federal regulation is proving thorny for some other insurers attempting to tap into a broader federal funding program, as they try to boost capital drained away by investment losses.

Eligibility for the government’s $700 billion bailout of the financial services sector is limited to those that are federally regulated, leaving most insurers out in the cold. (emphasis added)

Favoring federal regulation

Lloyd’s, the world’s oldest and biggest insurance market, does significant business in the United States and has long been in favor of the United States taking a federal regulatory approach. The prospect was shunted until recently because some in the industry, including state regulators, opposed it.

More than 2 trillion euros (about $2.5 trillion) has been pledged for troubled financial services firms by European governments to date, and in the United States $700 billion has been set aside for the Troubled Assets Relief Program, or TARP, not including additional sums committed in the bailouts of government-sponsored entities, AIG and others.

“Insurers would be better served” by a federal regulator, said Joseph Perella, managing partner of corporate advisory firm Perella Weinberg Partners, speaking at a forum on business risks hosted by Lloyd’s. (emphasis added)

Regulatory change more broadly is long overdue, Mr. Perella added, noting that oversight generally has not kept pace with massive shifts in business markets over the past few decades.

In the United States, “state and federal coordination must improve,” he added.

Mr. Perella, a veteran dealmaker who founded his advisory firm after a long career in banking, is an advisor to C.V. Starr, a firm run by former AIG Chief Executive Maurice R. Greenberg.

C.V. Starr was AIG’s largest shareholder before the government took an 80% stake as part of its rescue plan.

Several insurers, including Hartford Financial Services Group Inc., a large life and property insurer, have rushed to buy small banks, which are federally regulated, in order to meet eligibility for federal funding.

“You have got to expect these kind of things to happen when there is ($700 billion) on the table,” said Mr. Perella. (emphasis added)

Damned if we do and damned if we don’t – but federal regulation is about doing what’s good for the customers o the industry.  As to expectations about the $700million on the table – get off the table Mable, the quarter’s for the beer!