At times I’ve seen a notice on a docket reminding both parties that each is to submit a settlement proposal to the court prior to the meeting. All of this led me to believe these conferences are very proper, formal meetings and nothing I’ve read has suggested more than one is scheduled by the court – or rather nothing I’ve read until last week:
What you see on the Politz docket for 7/28/09 is a TEXT ONLY ORDER issued by Judge Senter setting the Expedited Briefing Schedule Respectfully Requested by Counsel for Mrs. Politz with the Motion for Review of and Objection to the United States Magistrate Judge’s Order denying Mrs. Politz’s motion to designate her own mental health expert.
Counsel for Mrs. Politz also requested a hearing on the Motion; BUT, what you see in the three entries above Judge Senter’s Order is a Notice of Hearing Settlement Conference – and who’s idea was that? Judge Walker’s? Is this cartoon from Nowdy’s newest favorite, LawComix, a more accurate view of a settlement conference than the formal meeting I had in mind? Continue reading “Judge Walker orders ANOTHER settlement conference in Politz v Nationwide”