Tag: Civil Conspiracy

Doomsday for the former Goatherder in Chief?

Former Goatherder in Chief Aaron Broussard
Former Goatherder in Chief Aaron Broussard / Image via the Times Picayune / NOLA Media Group

Judge declines to toss out Katrina flooding lawsuit against Aaron Broussard and Jefferson Parish ~ Paul Purpura

Peytavin noted there were too many questions concerning Broussard’s credibility to make the pretrial judgments. The judge twice noted in his three rulings that Broussard has given only one deposition.

Something tells me Darleen Jacobs’ people will not be the only ones making the trip to the Federal Pen in Butner North Carolina to depose the former Goatherder in Chief. If I may be so bold to suggest a full fleshing out of this evacuation to Mount Hermon Louisiana nonsense because that is exactly what Broussard and his doomsday plan are: complete nonsense.

My own considered opinion is Broussard intentionally flooded the Parish via abandonment of the pumps so he and his cronies could partake in some disaster crony capitalism that resulted from the flooding. At least that is what a preponderance of the evidence tells me. I’m proud Slabbed contributed to the knowledge base that is the Broussard Flood of 2005. Speaking of that knowledge base, these three archival posts from Nowdy are must reads on this topic: Continue reading “Doomsday for the former Goatherder in Chief?”

Today’s minute entry is on me

Minute Entry: Handshoe v Broussard et al 13cv251
September 13, 2013

TEXT ORDER ONLY The Court finds that pursuant Rule 16(b)(3)(B) of the Uniform Local Rules for the Northern and Southern Districts of Mississippi (L.U.Civ.R, effective 12/1/2011) provides that the filing a motion involving a jurisdictional defense motion stays the attorney conference and disclosure requirements and all discovery not related to the issue pending the Court’s ruling on the motion. The the Court find that the Defendants, Charles Leary, Vaughn Perret and Trout Point Lodge Limited’s Motion for Protective Order [27] should be granted in part and denied in part, discovery solely directed to issues pertaining to the pending Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction [14] may proceed and Defendants must respond to the aforementioned discovery on or prior to September 27, 2013. No further written order shall be issued by this Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Roper on September 13,2013 (JFN)

Discovery referenced above can be found here.

Do you hear what I hear? Know what I know? See what I see?

It must be Christmas in July!

Other crimes Broussard p 46

Still don’t see it? Let’s examine this document like an auditor would: Continue reading “Do you hear what I hear? Know what I know? See what I see?”