Slabbed updates the Trout Point Lodge / Randall Cajun lawsuit against Jones Walker

But first some lovely music from our friends in Spain:

The allegations of fraud are priceless folks. Business must be bad for the gang at the Lodge because the Civil District Cost Docket indicates the court fees were short paid. Of course, in Randall Cajun’s fantasy world Slabbed’s precedent setting SPEECH Act victory over these SLAPP Happy nuts occurred in New Orleans instead of Gulfport. They also conveniently ignore the fact their Nova Scotia lawsuits were so poorly plead the court concluded they could never win a default here in the US with such deficient, infantile pleadings. The judicial beatdown frankly could not have been worse for them but that is their own fault. As for Slabbed, we remain the champs. Click the pic to score 33 pages of typical Goatherder Jackassery:

TPL V JW First Amended Petition

TPL V JW First Amended Petition

For those of you scratching your heads trying to keep up, a partial list of the Goatherderian reign of litigation terrorism can be found in the post tags, some of which are new because the suits are new. Stay tuned.

5 thoughts on “Slabbed updates the Trout Point Lodge / Randall Cajun lawsuit against Jones Walker”

    1. :-)

      I remain guilty of “wrenching the fruits of victory” away from them.

      Meantime I have this from a commenter the Goatherders frequently mentioned in their court filings:

      If I had known how many times the Stooges would bring my user name before the courts I might have chosen a better one… like niggly nuts or barf burgers, just to see them type it. Heh heh.

      1. Re-reading the crap, La.C.C.P. Art. 891 comes to mind:

        The petition shall comply with Articles 853, 854, and 863, and, whenever applicable, with Articles 855 through 861. It shall set forth the name, surname, and domicile of the parties; shall contain a short, clear, and concise statement of all causes of action arising out of, and of the material facts of, the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the litigation; shall designate an address, not a post office box, for receipt of service of all items involving the litigation; and shall conclude with a prayer for judgment for the relief sought. Relief may be prayed for in the alternative.

        NOTE: “short, clear, and concise statement of all causes of action arising out of, and of the material facts of, the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the litigation….”

        Although Doug’s nuking the goatbutters is funny, certainly the recital of same consists of facts NOT material to the “transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the litigation….”

  1. Of course, if the jester was truly exercising his/her authority, a lot of the screed would be stricken sua sponte as violative of the rules. Indeed, Jones Walker if they had the sense of a drugstore attorney, would move to strike all the nonsensical fairy (queer?) tale blather as needless, and indeed, not relevant to the matter before the court.

    The goatherders must believe that repeating their bullshit will eventually get some judge to entertain their non-relevant, non-justiciable crap.

  2. we suggest an edit – “trout point less” ! it is obvious that these characters have fallen off the tip of the point as they continue to swim upstream into waters less favorable. we have no doubt that the weighted hooks of jones, walker and others will be the bottom catch we all have been waiting for.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *