8 thoughts on “Shades of Gates v Strain?”

  1. Doug, let us see just how principled the thugs at Jeff Gov are – if they do not file an objection, we know where they are coming from in this pathetic escapade, as government thugs ALWAYS hide – unless of course it is good for them!

    1. I once wrote here that I thought Deb Foshee conducted the affairs of the Parish Attorney’s office ethically and above board. Nothing has happened since to change my opinion.

      1. I understand, Doug, but with decades of dealings with government litigation, no, assuredly no public sector attorney lets such a request like this go w/o protest, if for no other reason than to prevent wholesale reading of public records and in this case, breaching attorney-client confidences. (Yes, admittedly an oxymoron for public records!)

  2. P.S. Doug – either Abel talked to the thugs at JeffGov (hmm, reminds one of a ministry in 1984) in advance and got an understanding on parameters of search, or we better see a protective order filed by JeffGov. Other than that, the fix would be apparent.

  3. NAAP:Doug’s gotta’ cat walk the newly designed and discovered Haspel Factory’s extinction “brief”, before the eyes of the Honorable high fashion Judge, which reveals the “stalking” nature and full frontal exposure of the disrespectfully inferior and outrageously arrogant Fruit of The Loom brand.

    From its juvenile frivolous introduction without proper research and development, limp genital generalities, no ass support,girly lines, breathless repetitious stitching to finally its intentional violation of the most highest fashion Rules and Orders.Once exposed no recall,remodeled edition or price drop will save Fruit of The Loom from extinction( next step after sanctions).

    And Doug, my man you are gonna look great in your new Haspel Factory “brief”-I gaurantee it!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *