Well folks, back in late September I put my Carnac the Magnificent hat on and predicted Fazzio lawyer Stephen London and his sidekicks would be DQ’d from USA v Fazzio as there was only one way Judge Ginger Berrigan could rule on the government’s motion and be on solid legal ground. According to Gordon Russell at the T-P that is exactly what Judge Ginger did as she disqualified London, James Cobb and Stephen Haedicke from representing Team Fazzio in USA v Fazzio. Guy’s don’t let the door hit ya where the good lord split ya!
If Big D is gonna win this case he will not be able to coordinate his legal defense in the Garner fleecing, with a supposedly uninvolved party in Team River Birch Landfill. My new prediction is if Fazzio does not roll over, not only will he be crushed in the Garner Services scam he’ll get a double dose when he is prosecuted with Jim Ward and Fred Heebe down the road.
File this one under I’ve seen this before.
sop
Atty's London and Cobb were meeting with FREDDY'S River Burch Attorney's and only indemnified CFO, FAZZIO, i.e. would only pay Fazzio's atty. fees FROM A TOTALLY SEPARATE SCHEME, if Fazzio protects River Burch, i. e. FREDDY.
Can someone 'splain to me please why Judge Ginger should not be recused from anything Heebe under the circumstances ? My understanding is that she clerked for Freaky Freddie's biological father, Sr. Status Judge Heebe who is still one of her collegues…so tell me why all the judges should not be recused ( or recuse themselves) a la Edith Jones in the Jefferson Parish indictments? I am so confused…exactly WHAT is the difference again?
FREDDY is NOT indicted for anything YET. Fazzio indictment if are separate crimes from tghe RB investigation. S 455 "reasonable appearance of impropriety" NOT YET present. r