Jim Brown

Thursday, April 28, 2011
Baton Rouge, Louisiana


All this week, Florida’s largest newspaper, the Miami Herald, has been writing both feature articles and editorials about the problems facing Florida property owners in finding affordable insurance.  Day after day, headlines conveyed the intensity of the struggle —  “Storm Warning: Prop up Insurance,” was a typical lead, along with, “Is Citizens Insurance ready for the big one?” and “Lawmakers still scrambling on wind insurance.”  Florida, like all gulf coast states, has problems of both insurance affordability and availability.  But here’s the difference between the Sunshine state and the Bayou state.  Florida is giving the problem serious attention.  It’s a front and center concern for the governor, the legislature, insurance regulators, and the news media.   In Louisiana where I live, there is hardly a whisper.

When Florida Governor Rick Scott took office a few months ago, his first words of commitment were:  “The lack of available and affordable property insurance is the biggest threat to our economy.” Just this week, Scott began exploring how to sharply curtail or even shut down the state’s Citizens Property Insurance Company. The Miami Herald editorialized just last week that the Florida legislature should allow no more property insurance rates in the state. The Florida governor and the legislature are taking the insurance problem head-on.

Florida has significantly more hurricane exposure than does Louisiana.  Ninety percent of all homeowners live within a few miles of the Gulf or the Atlantic Ocean.  A hurricane crossing the Florida peninsula slows down, at best, only 15 miles per hour.  Yet in spite of all this exposure, property insurance rates are cheaper in Florida than in Louisiana.  In Perdido Key, on the Florida-Alabama border, many Louisianans have beach homes or condos.  On average, they pay significantly less on these properties than they do on their homes in New Orleans, Baton Rouge and other Louisiana cities. Property insurance rates for commercial real estate have gone down, somewhere in the neighborhood of 30% to 40%, according realtor Steve Ekovich of the Tampa office of Marcus & Millichap, and insurance is more available.

Look at the figures released by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners.  In Louisiana, for every $100 of residential property insurance, the homeowner paid, on average, $1.006.  In Florida, a similar homeowner paid only 69.3 cents.  Louisiana has, hands down, the most expensive property insurance rates in the entire U.S.  Yet Florida has much more exposure.  Why?

Simply put, Florida officials, from the Governor on down, have made insurance affordability a front burner issue.  In Louisiana, it has been little more than a blip on the radar. The Louisiana legislature began meeting just this week, and newspapers across the state ran stories listing the state’s top issues and concerns. Insurance wasn’t mentioned. Louisiana is a state with the highest automobile and property insurance rates in the entire comity, yet not one solution was suggested by Louisiana insurance officials or legislators.

Like Louisiana, Florida has a Citizens Property Insurance Company that is state created and sells to those homeowners who cannot find insurance anywhere else.  The difference is in legislative support.  From day one, the Florida Company has received state funds on a regular basis to build up reserves.  By properly managing the company, Florida Citizens has almost $ 4 billion in cash in the bank to pay claims. There is also in place a bank line of credit and proceeds from municipal bonds that put total available funds at close to $7 billion.

Florida has also created a Hurricane Catastrophe Fund to back up and reinsurance losses for both Citizens and other private insurance companies operating in the state.   This year, Citizens purchased nearly $9.8 billion in coverage. So all tolled, the Florida state created company has the ability to handle claims of up to $16.8 billion. 

 So how does Louisiana stack up?  Well, for starters, due to inept and corrupt management before Katrina hit, no back up funds were arranged, and Katrina and Rita claims now exceed well over $1 billion.  There was only minor reinsurance in place when the two major storms hit in 2005. The company was recently tagged with a $95 million legal judgment for failing to pay claims on time, and the former CEO is serving time in jail for misappropriating for his personal use hundreds of thousands of dollars. There is no wonder why the company, created by the legislature and overseen by the Insurance Department, has been called the biggest financial disaster in Louisiana history.

There have been eight major hurricanes that have hit Florida since their legislature created Citizens.  Yet 40 new companies have come into Florida to sell property insurance, and ten of their companies sell windstorm coverage right along the most exposed areas of the Florida coast. But to qualify for the available insurance in these storm-prone areas, strict building code requirements are in place.  The roofs of such insured homes must have been updated since 1996.  And all window protection, including required shutters, must meet specific state and local regulations.

Has Florida solved its property insurance problems?  Hardly.  Increasing costs and continuing hurricane exposure makes any effort to control insurance rates all the more challenging.  The difference between Florida and Louisiana is one of effort and priorities.  The Florida Insurance Commissioner is lobbying hard for a national catastrophic program for gulf coast states.  Florida congressmen are pushing a number of programs in Washington.  The legislature meets regularly to discuss insurance issues, and Governor Scott makes no bones about the fact that insurance issues will be at the top of his legislative agenda.

There is a proactive effort in Florida to protect consumers. Here’s what the Miami Herald said this week about current Insurance Commissioner Kevin McCarty:  “He has not hesitated to take on the insurance industry when he thought consumers were being scalped.”  The new House Speaker said this week that property insurance issues are of huge concern to Florida legislators. “This is a very complex issue and I hope we see some solid solutions come forth, but it won’t be easy,” he said.

No, it won’t be easy, but there seems to be a major good faith effort by Florida officials to keep affordable insurance front and center.  In Louisiana, property insurance issues have faded away and are barely a blip on the perennial screen, with little comment or concern expressed by any public official. So is it any wonder why Louisiana property owners continue to pay the highest rates in the nation? 

Louisiana business and homeowners, when you look across the board at all the higher insurance costs they are absorbing, are paying some $3 billion more than if they were paying the national average of such costs. Think what an additional $3 billion in the Louisiana economy would mean to the economic vitality of the state. So why isn’t more being done by Louisiana officials? A good question to be asking as election season approaches.


“It’s not hurricanes that are causing high insurance rates, but bad government policy,” ~ Policy analyst Michelle Minton

Peace and Justice.

Jim Brown

Jim Brown’s syndicated column appears each week in numerous newspapers and websites throughout the South. You can read all his past columns and see continuing updates at www.jimbrownusa.com. You can also hear Jim’s nationally syndicated radio show each Sunday morning from 9 am till 11:00 am, central time, on the Genesis Radio Network, with a live stream at http://www.jimbrownusa.com.

6 thoughts on “Jim Brown”

  1. Behold the awful price of having a clown like Jim Donelon for insurance commish. The only thing worse is having an sold out idiot with his head up his ass like Mississippi’s Mike Chaney.


  2. Donelon is awful, but he’s not the one who permitted the bum rush on policyholders known as the “Named Storm Deductible.” That would be the author of this article. I am sure Mr. Brown reads slabbed, so I am BEGGING him for an explanation of why he permitted homeowners insurers, led by State Farm, to stick Louisiana residents with these outrageous deductible schemes, which only require insurers to pay for moderate to severe wind damage from a tropical system, and then not for all of it. What a tremendous gift-wrapped windfall Mr. Brown gave the industry at the expense of the premium-paying folks who elected him.

  3. This is really a sad state of affairs. The elected officials in Louisiana are more concerned with sponsoring Birther Bills than they are about the insurance issues facing property owners.

  4. Mr. Brown, like Sock has mentioned above, of all people you should know the answer to your own question before asking it- why La. has not addressed the outrageous state wide insurance rates ? You of all hypocrites know the answer, as it has been given time and time again, just follow the money doled out by the insurance lobbyist devils to each and every legi, including you and Mr. Donelon. Until this state does something about the Money Train to Baton Rouge nothing will change. Additionally, the reason why not all evacuees ever moved back to NOLA and the Gulf Coast is also simple to answer- ONGOING INSURANCE RAPE. If governor ” Bermhead ” , the village idiot and ethics witch doctor, was really honest about bringing new industry, business and population back to La. he would tackle this issue head on, but unfortunately motormouth also gets his money train ticket all too frequently punched by the same lobbyists. Then again Mr. Brown, I challenge you to respond to your own challenge and become an insurance reform consultant and write one of your truthful books and explain the inner workings of insurance rate corruption which sometimes reformed cons do to help society prevent such crimes from continuing.

  5. I certainly respect Mr. Brown and his opinions. however, I have some disagreement of his assessment of the insurance market in FL. One of the reasons the premiums are lower is Citizens Insurance is grossly underpriced. It is a common belief inside the industry that Citizens is a “house of cards” in case of a major event. Having $4B in capital will not come close to be ing adequate if there is widespread hurricane. Then the citizens of FL will be on the hook for the losses.

    Concerning the issue of “named storm deductibles”, this is not just a LA situation. It is common throughout hurricane prone states. They are absolutely necessary if the private sector is going to provide Homeowner insuarance in these states.

  6. No, “Named Storm Deductibles” (originally “Hurricane Deductibles”) are absolutely necessary if the insurance companies are going to continue to gouge their customers, who are paying higher premiums for much less coverage. Some insurance issues are fairly debatable, but this one is not. Then again, you bolster my point, which was that Mr. Brown carried the water for the industry on this ripoff. Sup, who shills for the industry, finds them necessary. Therefore, this is a fine illustration that the industry, vis-a-vis Sup, approves of Brown’s matador move as the insurance industry once again gored coastal residents.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *