Breaking News: Government Responds to Scruggs’ Motion for Depositions UPDATED

Start reading and I’ll catch up with comments:

Let’s just say that I look forward to reading Zach’s Rebuttal.  The Government’s Response sidesteps the issue of Farese’s dual representation while appearing to address it and glosses over the role of their lackey, Judge Lackey. More importantly, unless I missed the reference, the missing November 19th recording and FBI reports are not addressed at all.  In a word, the Government’s response was “cute”.  Bottom line, fluff is better than snarky but neither are a substitute for justice.

[scribd id=50562648 key=key-28j6a3u2omnu884l80vb mode=list]

One thought on “Breaking News: Government Responds to Scruggs’ Motion for Depositions UPDATED”

  1. Hey guys, I just opened the response in scrib twice on different computers and was attacked by malicious malware. Just saying. Be ware. Now I gave to read on my phone which is not easy.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *