Here is a bit of background courtesy of Anne Marie Vandenweghe:
I received three responses to my PRR 441-10 for all Parish Attorney Organizational Charts from 1990 to present.
- Mary Galley’s response ( Her title is listed SECRETARY TO PARISH ATTORNEY); Certification dated 03/04/2010
- Chris Gillen’s response ( His title is listed ASSISTANT TO PARISH ATTORNEY); Certification dated 03/04/2010
- Peggy Barton’s response ( Who at the time was ACTING PARISH ATTORNEY); Certification dated 03/05/2010
At the beginning of January 2010 as the paralegal issue flared up Val Bracy had requested the same thing and in gathering the responses for Val’s PRR I discovered that one day after the PRR came in Peggy Barton had revised the chart by removing the paralegals from under her supervision. The box(es) with Karen Parker Broussard had disappeared. Barton did not supply any other chart(s) in response, just the one she had manipulated.
OK folks, I’ve seen all three PRR responses. Mary Galley’s response had all the org charts contained in Gillen’s and Barton’s response. Now flip through the Scribd embed following and follow the bouncing Broussard until poof, she disappears.
[scribd id=49005940 key=key-2jhlkqhzuki96sr79uxz mode=list]
I’d like to know what Mrs Barton knew about Karen Parker Broussard and when did she know it. She was under Barton on the chain of command for quite a while until poof, she disappeared.
Perhaps this is sort of stuff Judge LaDart was worried would leak out if they gave AMV her emails back.