Stop the lies about HR 1264- Taylor's bill to provide multiperil coverage under NFIP essential to strong economy

Once again, instead of walking the talk of jobs and economic recovery, government is about to stumble – tripped, this time, by lies about the need to enable the purchase of multiperil coverage and optional separate windstorm coverage under the NFIP as proposed in HR 1264.

The truth about the need for HR 1264 can be found on the Congressman’s website and is summarized in his recent “Dear Colleague” letter below”

Dear Colleague:

You may have received statements or letters in opposition to H.R. 1264, the Multiple Peril Insurance Act. These statements all appear to be based on the same false assumptions that the private insurance industry is meeting the demand in coastal areas and that insurance premiums in coastal areas are appropriately priced. These statements are not supported by the facts or the economics of the hurricane insurance market.

There is no functioning, competitive market for property insurance in coastal areas. Millions of homeowners and business owners have inelastic demand, which means that they are required by their mortgages or lenders to buy windstorm coverage. However, private insurance companies are not required to sell it to them, and companies have stopped writing new coverage in most coastal markets, even though all of the Gulf states and most of the Atlantic states allow insurers to charge premiums that are several times higher than what they expect to pay in claims.

Since Katrina, insurance companies have abandoned coastal communities, creating an urgent insurance crisis along the Gulf Coast and Atlantic . State-sponsored high-risk pools have been forced to absorb more than $345 billion dollars of new hurricane exposure but are not able to build up enough reserves to cover a major hurricane that would result in a large volume of claims at one time.

The state insurance pools also have inelastic demand. Because they have not been able to build up the reserves to cover a major hurricane, the state pools are forced to buy billions of dollars of reinsurance coverage every year. The reinsurance industry also is not a competitive market, so the state pools are forced to pay premiums that are many times more than the expected claims. In the failed coastal insurance market and the global insurance market, there is no choice, no transparency, and therefore, no free market pricing or efficiency. As a result, most of the resulting insurance premiums each year are paying generous returns for reinsurance investors, but not building up reserves to pay future insurance claims.

Research by Dr. Howard Kunreuther and Dr. Erwann Michel-Kerjan at the Wharton Risk Management Center at the University of Pennsylvania found that catastrophe insurance premiums in the highest risk areas are as much as ten times higher than the expected claims losses. (Managing Large-Scale Risks in a New Era of Catastrophes, Wharton Risk Management Center, University of Pennsylvania, 2008. p. 141).

The table below shows what happened to members of the Hancock County Chamber of Commerce after Hurricane Katrina when their insurance companies dropped their policies and dumped them into the Mississippi Wind Pool. The wind pool suddenly took on several billions of dollars of insurance liability without the reserves to cover that exposure, so the wind pool had no choice but to pay outrageous prices for reinsurance coverage.

Economist Lloyd Dixon of the RAND Corporation has explained the advantage of a government insurance program in high-risk areas:

“Government is not subject to the private-sector factors that produce large swings in premiums around expected loss in private insurance markets. Thus, compared with the private sector, government should be able to set insurance prices closer to expected loss for hurricanes and other catastrophic risks, and keep those prices closer to expected loss over time.

(Lloyd Dixon, James Macdonald, and Julie Zissimopoulos, Coastal Wind Insurance in the Gulf States, RAND Gulf States Policy Institute, 2007, p. 8).

The federal government would be able to establish a hurricane insurance program that would spread risk geographically along the Gulf and Atlantic states. The federal program would be able to set rates based on the risk and create a stable insurance market. It would be very easy for the new program to determine wind risk and set wind premiums, because the state governments, the building industry, and the insurance industry have already done most of the work for them. For example, this is how the Mississippi Wind Pool sets its rates.

The Mississippi Wind Pool is the wind insurer of last resort for the three counties on the Gulf of Mexico and the three counties directly above those. The wind pool divides the territory into four rate zones:

Zone A – Between the Gulf of Mexico and the CSX Railroad

Zone B – Between the CSX Railroad and Interstate-10

Zone C – From I-10 north to the county lines

Zone D – The second tier of counties above the coastal counties

Within each zone, the wind pool board establishes risk-based rates for frame construction and masonry construction with several policy options for higher or lower deductibles. The wind pool also has a program that grants premium reductions for structures that meet a high wind-load mitigation standard. The zones, the rates, and the mitigation credits are based on plenty of available data from the American Society of Civil Engineers, the International Code Council, and many other interested parties who study wind risk and building performance.

Other states with wind pools have established wind risk zones in similar manner, often using any easily identifiable and unambiguous feature to divide the zones. The Texas wind pool uses the Intracoastal Canal to divide the highest risk zone from the second zone.

Wind risk is much easier to determine and to map than is flood risk. The probability and severity of hurricane winds is much easier to predict than flood risk based on assumptions about levee systems, on predictions about the severity of storm surge. Wind risk also does not constantly change with any change in topography as flood risk does.


Member of Congress

7 thoughts on “Stop the lies about HR 1264- Taylor's bill to provide multiperil coverage under NFIP essential to strong economy”

  1. Nowdy

    I’ve got to say I don’t want the feds anywhere around coastal insurance with there track record…. they will collect the monies…they will have it on the books like Social Security and when it comes time to pay…oh well

    While the state wind funds is less than ideal. I would perfer to see it on a state bases, or even see several state band together in their funds. I have really gotten to the point in my life I’m am tired of the federal government controling stuff. They have proven they can not handle squat. In a perfect world…maybe, but in the world I have been living in no thanks

  2. The federal government paid for everything. NFIP paid for both flood and wind damage. Those without flood insurance got homeowner grants, FEMA trailers, SBA loans, casualty loss tax deductions. Feds built new and better bridges, public buildings, schools. Billions of dollars from the federal government got the recovery this far.

    Mississippi and Louisiana still can’t pay for anything five years later. If you were counting on the state alone for help you would be waiting a long time.

    The insurance industry has been the biggest obstacle to recovery, first by not paying claims fairly then by hiking premiums and leaving the coastal market.

    So the Chamber of Commerce and the Sierra Club and the Obama Administration join with the insurance industry to oppose a federal insurance program that would spread the coastal risk, pay claims fairly and promptly, speed up hurricane recovery, and save taxpayers billions of dollars in disaster assistance costs.

    The Home Builders and the Realtors, the groups most involved in the housing recovery, support the bill because they know how insurance is killing the recovery, and because those organizations listen to their members before taking positions.

    The opponents on the other hand are top down organizations in which the lobbyists tell the members what to support or oppose instead of the other way around.

  3. This is off the topic, but I need to VENT!

    HORRIFIC Conditions at Record Sale

    WTUL Radio sponsored a Record Sale which was held Saturday, July 24th in New Orleans.
    The event was made known to me by solicitation & I paid to attend as a vendor.
    It was an absolute abomination & a serious health & safety hazard.
    The space was enclosed & I endured 6 hours in stifling heat along with other sellers & attendees.
    It seems that common sense would dictate that sponsoring an event which gathers that many people into an enclosed space, in New Orleans, in July, with no air conditioning & no ventilation
    is inhumane & probably illegal.

    I feel as thought the money a paid is akin to paying a slumlord. I saw many people on the verge of collapse, myself & my partner included.

    One may ask, “Why didn’t you simply leave?” I invested many hours to prepare for this event, including dismantling my media center in order to provide my own tables as a personal favor to the organizer of the sale. I loaded them in my vehicle & when I arrived at the venue, there was no room to set them up. I sorted, priced & inspected hundreds of records in order to provide an easy & responsible selling environment for the buyers, many of whom I regard as personal friends & were invited by me.

    When I returned home, I immediately sent communications to the friends I had invited & apologized for subjecting them to the hideous conditions, which of course I was unaware of until I arrived.

    Then I unloaded the tables which were totally useless that day, reconfigured my media center,
    carried in the records I brought home & took a much needed bath.
    Then, I GOT ANGRY.

    I was physically exhausted & embarrassed to have invited my friends into such a hideous environment.

    I expected that WTUL would incorporate the common sense & regard for people’s health & safety when sponsoring & advertising a record sale.

    I was wrong.

  4. OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOwweeeeeeeeeeeeeee Nowdy, after looking at the increased rates it appears we are getting screwed and tatooed on premiums, but why are dentists crucified the most? Thats why elderly uncle, parrot and I are living in the rainforest! I’m afraid if Congress doesn’t pass the bill there may be a waiting list to live in the rainforests of Louisiana and Mississippi. And people wonder why the housing markets are depressed especially in La. and Miss.. Congress can’t even keep the flood program funded from month to month. We need a voting clean sweep of the Congress and locally especially in Jefferson Parish OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOowweeeeeeeeeeeeee

  5. Ignatius good luck pooling Citizens with any other State pool. Besides it being badly run it is insolvent. Most likely explains why even Diaper Dave is supporting Gene on this one.

    We gutted out the NFIP years ago. It is more proper to call it NFIP Inc. It has been run by the insurers for their benefit for years. It was the backstop before we started giving away taxpayer subsidies called backstops to insurers.

    For his part Obama came here to Mississippi in 2008 saying he was open to the concept of multi peril insurance. He lied of course, essentially saying anything to get votes. He has handled his campaign promises about as well as the oil spill, financial reform and health care which is to say not very well.


  6. Very few people can lay claim to the title POTUS. Even fewer are the number that had a chance to accomplish greatness. Obama had that chance IMHO and blew it. Granted he is an improvment over Bush but that isn’t saying much.

    Obama does not get credit because he does not deserve any.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *