TWIA’S 11.2% allocation to wind damage – 100% hot air

TWIA (Texas Windstorm Insurance Association) appears to be convinced ignorance can be a defense; but, what they’ve done to policyholders slabbed by Hurricane Ike is indefensible. Chip Merlin reported on the 11.2% hoax in a recent post, Slabbers Finally Learn How They All Have Exactly 11.2% Damage:

The Bolivar Peninsula TWIA policyholders have had the most frustrating insurance claim experience of any group in recent memory. While we have been having success with other Hurricane Ike claims, the Slabbers claims resolutions have proven difficult. They have not just back and taken this abuse either as I noted in Texas Windstorm “Slabbers” and Policyholders March on Austin.

One even made a joke about how, according to TWIA, they each have exactly 11.2% of building value damage, reflected in The Parable of Hurricane Ike Insurance Claims

…from what we have reviewed regarding the accuracy and low-balling of the TWIA estimates of partial damage, the entire population will have to be revised

As a result of Javier Delagado following up on evidence produced in an administrative trial, Slabbers finally have the answer of how TWIA performed the calculations that everybody has exactly the same damage. The person making the calculation for TWIA was University of Texas Professor William Spelman. The TWIA attorneys introduced his testimony via a previous administrative hearing to avoid expense—so much for the ability to confront and cross examine a witness. The TWIA pleading was very telling:

Dr. William Spelman provided sworn testimony in a previous contested case hearing involving a “slab” claim (see SOAH docket No. 454-09-3158.E). He has not been retained by T.W.I.A. to specifically evaluate any particular claim, but rather he was reetained to perform a statistical analysis from which all slab claims were evaluated by T.W.I.A. His sworn testimony offered in the previous contested case hearing explained the process by which he performed his statistical analysis, and another witness explained how that statistical analysis was applied to the particular slab claim.

Spelman’s transcript revealed that he has no insurance claim experience. Instead, his education is political science, economics, and public policy. He is not a contractor, estimator, meteorologist, or engineer. He teaches applied math and statistics at the University of Texas-Austin School of Public Affairs.

The “Reader’s Digest” version of what he did to calculate how each of the Bolivar Slabbers would be entitled to 11.2% was to perform a statistical regression analysis where three main variables were considered to provide a statistical expectancy that 95% of all residential Slabbers would fully be indemnified for wind only damage if TWIA paid 11.2% of the insured value of the structure. He was provided information and variables from 387 TWIA estimated claims of partial damage. After consultation with TWIA retained engineers, he considered 18 different variables from those claims, but found that only three of them had a significant impact upon the wind damage. Those three variables were:

  1. Whether the building use was residential or commercial.
  2. Whether the building was constructed before 2004.
  3. Whether the roof was placed on the structure before 1989.

He determined a “loss ratio” which he defined as the Actual Cash Value payment by TWIA on the partial damage buildings divided by the Insured Value. The average residential payment loss ratio was 9.8%. But, if TWIA paid 11.2%, he calculated that 95% of all Slabbers would statistically have their full indemnity on an actual cash value basis.

There is much to criticize with this work. Indeed, from what we have reviewed regarding the accuracy and low-balling of the TWIA estimates of partial damage, the entire population will have to be revised. We will provide more on the extent TWIA underpays wind damage claims on partial losses.

Still, I felt that Slabbers are entitled to know the person and how the amount was arrived at. Here is the pleading and testimony for everybody’s review.

The folks at TWIA have certainly made a mess in Texas!

One thought on “TWIA’S 11.2% allocation to wind damage – 100% hot air”

  1. I have delt with TWIA and ended up in a deposition with them. They have screwed many customers. On page three of our report, the adjuster had pictures of some ridge vent missing along with 5/6 shingles missing as well. There were several places inside my home that showed the damage from the water leaking into my house. On page 4 he states there is no roof damage to the property. It was crazy. Hopefully the new claim I made today after 2 hail storms and 3-4 days of 60mph winds Ill get the roof I should have got 3 years ago.

Comments are closed.