…and a dim bulb flickered in Texas over at TWIA

While Commission Chaney had all the bright lights of insurance and finance shinning in Mississippi, a dim bulb flickered in the Texas Windstorm Insurance Association (TWIA), according to Texas’ oldest newspaper, the Galveston County Daily News:  h/t  always thoughtful reader

The Texas Windstorm Insurance Association wants a judge to give it immunity against paying attorneys’ fees, penalties, interests and other expenses beyond actual damages in litigation claiming it acted in bad faith or maliciously in dealings with policyholders.

In Bakht Khattak vs. Texas Windstorm Insurance Association, the insurer is seeking sovereign immunity, which means it can’t be sued without its consent.

If Judge Susan Criss of the 212th District Court in Galveston grants sovereign immunity in that case, her decision could apply to any lawsuit filed against the insurer since Hurricane Ike, which struck in September with 110 mph winds and devastating storm surge.

About all that can be said for this TWIA flicker is that it would require a lot less time and money than hiring lawyers to sneak around and get all the evidence against you classified a “trade secret”.

The windstorm association isn’t seeking dismissal of the lawsuit or others like it, officials said….

What the association’s attorneys at a Monday hearing asked Criss to do is exempt the insurer from compensation in excess of actual damages, including “exemplary, punitive, treble damages, penalties, interest, mental anguish damages, attorney’s fees or any consequential compensatory or actual damages other than policy benefits.”

Essentially, the association wants to be exempt from being sued on claims it acted in bad faith.

The association would continue to pay policy benefits in judgments against it, Jim Oliver, its manager, said. If the association lost a case because it made a mistake or used bad judgment, it also would pay the plaintiff’s legal fees, Oliver said…

“There’s no reason not to pay attorney’s fees and economic damages if it was determined that we should,” Oliver said. But some policyholders want much more, Oliver said.

The association wants to prevent some policyholders from attempting to win “the lottery” in court, Oliver said. Policyholders can sue for up to three times actual damages. If the association is forced to pay extra-contractural damages in hundreds of cases, rates would go up for all policyholders, Oliver said…

If the association got sovereign immunity, it would have far-reaching ramifications, said Steve Mostyn, attorney for Khattak, a League City resident who sued claiming the association paid too little to repair his roof, drywall and fence after Hurricane Ike.

If the insurer were exempted from codes protecting consumers from unfair or deceptive practices, there would be little to deter it from acting badly, Mostyn said.

“If you say to a company that all they ever have to pay is what they should have paid in the first place, then you will see conduct actually get worse,” Mostyn said.

“You will also see them never pay what they should have paid in the first place. I’m sorry, I do not believe in the benevolence of insurance companies.”

About 500 Ike-related lawsuits have been filed against the association. But not all involve claims the insurer acted in bad faith…

Khattak has not specified the damages he is seeking from the association…

Mr. Oliver was forced to knock on the courthouse door after his failed attempt to sell the idea to  policyholders serving in the Texas Legislature using his greedy policyholder argument – an approach commonly known as pissing in your whiskey.

The association wants sovereign immunity to apply in all such cases, Oliver said.

It’s common for governmental entities to declare sovereign immunity, but Mostyn argues the windstorm association is not one.

The association is made of all private insurers doing business in the state but was created by state lawmakers in 1972 as private windstorm insurers left risky coastal areas.

Attorneys for the windstorm association argue the insurer has the status to merit sovereign immunity.

State Rep. Craig Eiland, D-Galveston, contends that policyholders forced to hire attorneys and cover expenses out of pocket while waiting months for claims to be resolved aren’t trying to win the lottery…

“TWIA is trying to be exempt from paying the same damages that other insurance companies pay if they are found by a jury to have committed specific unfair claims settlement practices,” said Eiland, who in April joined the ranks of frustrated coastal business and property owners when he filed a lawsuit against the association.

Eiland, who shapes insurance legislation as a state lawmaker, filed a lawsuit as a private business owner. Eiland is not seeking extra-contractural damages in his lawsuit, he said.

Eiland and other coastal lawmakers quashed an association bid for sovereign immunity during the last legislative session.

“There was absolutely no way in hell we would allow our constituents to be discriminated against on adjusting their claims,” Eiland said.

Criss has not ruled on the case.

Mr. Eiland and his fellow state lawmakers in Texas would be well served to read about the recent circus held in the Southern District Mississippi Federal Court, Hattiesburg.

Windpool center ring, Seals on reinsurance, AIG on high wire, Send in the clowns – Allstate, State Farm, Nationwide, Farm Bureau, Travelers

Same circus, new act – still playing in Federal Court

Windpool circus shuts down – just as Big Top goes up

One thought on “…and a dim bulb flickered in Texas over at TWIA”

  1. It’s like they’re notifying people they’re going to act in bad faith, but seeking permission not to be punished for it.

    Criminals would love that as well. They’d love to commit a crime and not pay the consequences for their actions.


Comments are closed.