You helped me find the reasons why
It took me by surprise that you understood
What a surprise it was, too – not the Order, as it had to come, but that Judge Senter issued the order for discovery prior to the hearing with no pending motion.
By prior order [261], I declined the Relators’ motions [212][230] for additional discovery prior to the hearing on Defendants’ consolidated motions presently scheduled for May 20, 2009…My ruling on the Relators’ discovery motions has not been formally challenged, but the Relators have raised the issue of discovery in an indirect way.
There’s no need for speculation, Judge Senter made his intent perfectly clear – providing both sides a full and fair opportunity to present the evidence they feel is relevant to the merits of the McIntosh flood claim.
In their responsive pleadings [264], the Relators assert that they are unduly limited in the evidence they can present because they do not have possession of the McIntosh claims file. The Relators have identified four sets of claims file documents they wish to obtain in order to present their side of this controversy: 1) all damage estimates State Farm made for the McIntosh property; 2) a full copy of the transaction logs on the McIntosh claims; 3) digital photographs of the damage to the McIntosh residence; and 4) correspondence related to Forensic Analysis Engineering Corporation’s assessment of the damage to the McIntosh property.
In addition to these documents, the Relators have identified seven witnesses Continue reading “BREAKING: Judge Senter issues Order for Discovery prior to hearing in Rigsby Qui Tam”