State Farm’s Response Memorandum severely complicates a simple request made by the Relators pursuant to this Court’s August 6, 2008 Order.
Einstein lives on in the Relators’ Reply supporting their Motion for Expedited Document Requests and addressing objections raised in State Farm’s Response.
Any fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius – and a lot of courage – to move in the opposite direction.
It took fewer than five pages of text (with footnotes and obligatory form deleted) for the Rigsbys counsel to make a simple but compelling argument supporting their simple request – and “a lot of courage” to move in the opposite direction with the ease apparent in the document filed today.
The Relators tried to make their request as simple and clear as possible by mirroring the words of Judge Acker’s preliminary injunction.
To make this even simpler for State Farm, however, the Relators are willing to streamline their request even further to the following: the set of documents that State Farm received pursuant to Judge Acker’s July 1, 2008 order.
This request now consists of nothing more than whatever discrete set of documents State Farm in fact received. Accordingly, State Farm can no longer argue regarding the scope of the request.
More than just courage, this “opposite direction” demonstrates the confidence the Rigsbys new counsel have in the merits of the qui tam claim. Continue reading “Relators file Reply re: State Farm's opposition to release of documents for discovery”