Acceptance of dissent is the fundamental requirement of a free society.
What, then, does it mean when the Justices of the Mississippi Supreme Court vote to ban publication of Judge Diaz’s dissenting opinion?
Well, take a look and then a guess.
A look at Diaz’s dissent shows he argues the error of the court’s decision that the statute of limitations for wrongful death lawsuits begins at the time of the injury, not on the date of death.
“The obvious result is that a wrongful death action may expire before the decedent does.
“This judicially created rule is without foundation, and frankly, absurd,” he adds in his seven-page document provided to the Daily Journal.
Patsy Brumfield had the story on-line for the Journal but a h/t goes to Y’all for the notice.
Obviously, voting to ban publication of a dissenting opinion is an assault on justice almost beyond comprehension – but so was the majority decision. Not to mention it gave common sense a pretty good whack, too.
What kind of tort reform is it to have folks filing suit for wrongful death while they’re still alive?
Patsy’s story has more details but we are left to guess the thinking behind the decision itself and the subsequent decision to ban the dissenting opinion of Justice Diaz; but, I suspect we’re not missing much. Continue reading “Supremely stupid decision – Mississippi Supreme Court bans publication of Justice Diaz's dissent”