The Advocate Reports on Perdigao: Goyeneche Says MCC Interested in Sholes

Thanks to an interested reader for the heads up to yesterday’s story on Perdigao in the Advocate. Allen Johnson Jr. filed the story. Rafael Goyeneche of the Metropolitan Crime Commission says he’s interested in the ticketing fixing allegations involving judicial candidate Ronald Sholes

James “Jamie” Perdigao, 46, is hardly a household name in New Orleans, even though federal prosecutors say the indicted lawyer stole $30 million.

According to the government, Perdigao purloined a far greater sum during his 13 years as a law partner at Adams & Reese, LLP than all court-ordered restitution orders combined against: imprisoned former Gov. Edwin Edwards ($2.5 million), incarcerated former Louisiana Senate President Michael O’Keefe ($1.7 million), and four — recently sentenced — associates of former Mayor Marc Morial’s administration ($1 million).

Yet, competition for headlines in New Orleans is pretty stiff. Lacking signs of a robust recovery from Hurricane Katrina, metro area news accounts are often filled with dramatic crimes and personal failings. For example, standing before U.S. District Judge Carl Barbier last week, Morial confidant Stan “Pampy” Barre admitted “skimming” $1 million from a city contract in 2002, and with a prosaic apology that all but ended the charismatic former mayor’s boast of a scandal-free administration.

“The city trusted me, and I stabbed her in the back in the dark of night,” said Barre, before the judge sentenced him to five years in prison.

To hear Perdigao tell it, Barre had plenty of help ripping off the public.

Perdigao, who faces trial on unrelated criminal charges, alleges Adams & Reese blocked federal grand jury investigations of the Morial administration after the former mayor went to work for the firm. Moreover, in a sensational civil racketeering suit, Perdigao places both himself and his alleged victims, Adams & Reese and the firm’s top lawyers, at the center of other alleged scandals and unethical schemes, including: the misuse of Louisiana film tax credits, an alleged 1997 bribery scheme involving U.S. Rep. William Jefferson (who faces trial on unrelated bribery charges in Virginia), ticket-fixing at New Orleans Traffic Court, and numerous alleged violations of professional standards of conduct for Louisiana lawyers.

Adams & Reese denies Perdigao’s allegations as both false and “fantasy.”

The firm is also asking U.S. District Judge Eldon Fallon to stop Perdigao from divulging the affairs of the firm and its 27 clients.

In addition, after two years of apparently dispirited cooperation with FBI agents and federal prosecutors, Perdigao has accused U.S. Attorney Jim Letten of pulling punches against sleazy government informants to protect high-profile court victories. Perdigao cites former Treasure Chest Casino owner Robert Guidry — the feds’ star witness against Edwin Edwards eight years ago. Guidry was a major client of Adams & Reese then, and as a partner for the firm Perdigao handled non-criminal matters for the millionaire. Perdigao says Letten failed to follow his juicy leads of alleged misconduct by Guidry, allegations the prosecutor vigorously denies.

Ironically, Perdigao himself was called by the government to testify about Guidry’s gambling interests, during the Edwards’ trial on Feb. 8, 2000. Eight years later, attorneys for Guidry and Adams & Reese have denounced Perdigao’s complaint as the self-serving statements of a “pathological liar.”

Letten is far less succinct when countering “Perdigao’s perfidy.”

Yet, Rafael Goyeneche, president of New Orleans Metropolitan Crime Commission, says the MCC is interested in Perdigao’s detailed allegations that a part-time Traffic Court judge employed by Adams & Reese also fixed tickets. “If true — and it’s a pretty important ‘if’ — and the allegations of ticket fixing can be proven, then the firm may have some exposure,” Goyeneche said.

Meanwhile, Judge Fallon recently had not yet ruled on a request by Adams & Reese to dismiss Perdigao’s civil suit. Perdigao remains both free on bond, pending his Dec. 1 criminal trial, and relatively obscure, for someone accused of stealing $30 million.

20 thoughts on “The Advocate Reports on Perdigao: Goyeneche Says MCC Interested in Sholes”

  1. Doesn’t sound like Goyeneche is too confident in Perdigao’s proof of the ticket-fixing scheme.

  2. He wants more proof Mr NAAS. The proof which was turned in with the MCC complaint was fairly detailed. I wonder what else he wants?

    sop

  3. I’m not certain anyone would be confident jumping out front on any of these issues or that any hesitation has anything to do with the merits of the issue involved. Don’t you imagine he’s feeling the pressure?

  4. i realize that it is a small town and everybody is friends — how many Adams and Reese attorneys are on the MCC Board?

  5. Board of Directors

    Robert D. Armstrong
    John T. Hutchens
    Arnold Baker Ronald B. Jones
    Luis Banos, Jr.
    John P. Laborde
    James Bean, Jr. John P. Laborde, Jr.

  6. I just gotta say: MCC ain’t going to do squat! You have to hand them the silver dollar in your pocket!

  7. It is probably hard for the MCC to investigate a report when a contributing member is involved.

  8. I can’t find anywhere that Ronald Sholes actually qualified to run for the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals.

    SJ – any info on that?

  9. I read that he wasn’t going to several weeks ago, NAAS, just can’t remember where. Seems like the issue was the amount of money it would take and another candidate far ahead in that regard. I bet if you google it that you’ll find the source – could have been the Times P.

  10. Can’t find anything – even in the TP.

    The “amount of money” excuse is priceless.

  11. Aside from “making tickets go away,” Judge Sholes is having ex parte communications.

  12. Well, whoever’s running (probably unopposed) for the 4th Circuit seat owes Perdigao a serious debt of gratitude for bringing the Sholes information to the fore.

  13. I must have read it on one of LA blogs on our blog roll. Trying to recall, NAAS – and looking, too, but so far haven’t been able to find it.

  14. New Orleans Politics – F.Donze/G.Filosa T/P 4-5-08

    Jumping the Gun – Never Mind!!
    Anticipating that 4th Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Leon Cannizzaro was going to resign in late April to run for district attorney, Traffic Court Judge Ron Sholes put up a Poydras Street billboard on March 31 calling on voters to “promote” Sholes.
    The sign is still up and will probably stay there for a while, but Sholes said recently that money troubles have forced him to abandon his plan to run in the October election for a job he described as a “lifelong dream.”
    Sholes said he had hoped to raise half of the anticipated $300,000 cost of the judgeship race by selling a piece of property, but he ended up taking a “hugh loss” on the deal. “There was just no way to fund a campaign, not without asking people to make large donations,” something Sholes said he wasn’t willing to do.
    This isn’t the first time money has sidelined Sholes’ judicial ambitions. In 1997, while he was on the Civil Court bench, Sholes cited economics as the main reason he dropped out of a Traffic Court race. Sholes ran again in 1998 and won

    LOL – snap,snap – stay tuned.

    later

  15. He shudda asked his niece for a piece of the action when she was taking all that traffic ticket money.

  16. Thanks, Sally, I knew I didn’t dream it but I could not remember where I read it. I do a lot of “homework” trying to learn more about Louisiana politics – mindboggling to say the least.

Comments are closed.